https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844674
Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kchamart(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart(a)redhat.com> ---
Hi,
I didn't realize the package was already 'ASSIGNED' for review till the end.
Anyhow, posting my review comments here, fwiw.
OK - rpmlint output. I think the below Error can be safely ignored.
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------#
kashyap@SPECS$ rpmlint python-swiftclient.spec
../SRPMS/python-swiftclient-1.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/python-swiftclient-*
python-swiftclient.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary swift
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------#
OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release
OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is ASL 2.0)
NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun
OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build. (It does build)
OK - The spec file must be written in American English.
OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible
OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL:
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------#
kashyap@SOURCES$ sha256sum python-swiftclient-1.1.1.tar.gz
73e8a1c0bb7354b7c0af5891f2fdf7b4fe9734ddc7fd38edb531c9ebdca350bc
python-swiftclient-1.1.1.tar.gz
kashyap@SOURCES$ sha256sum python-swiftclient-1.1.1.tar.gz-from-upstream
73e8a1c0bb7354b7c0af5891f2fdf7b4fe9734ddc7fd38edb531c9ebdca350bc
python-swiftclient-1.1.1.tar.gz-from-upstream
kashyap@SOURCES$
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------#
OK - Successfully koji scratch build:
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------#
kashyap@SPECS$ koji build --scratch f18
../SRPMS/python-swiftclient-1.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm
Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/python-swiftclient-1.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm
[====================================] 100% 00:00:02 49.67 KiB 22.48 KiB/sec
Created task: 4347259
Task info:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4347259
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
4347259 build (f18, python-swiftclient-1.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm): open
(
buildvm-29.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
4347260 buildArch (python-swiftclient-1.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm, noarch): free
4347260 buildArch (python-swiftclient-1.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm, noarch): free ->
open (
buildvm-25.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
4347260 buildArch (python-swiftclient-1.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm, noarch): open
(
buildvm-25.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed
4347259 build (f18, python-swiftclient-1.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm): open
(
buildvm-29.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed
4347259 build (f18, python-swiftclient-1.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm) completed
successfully
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------#
NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations)
NA - The package is not relocatable
OK - A package must own all directories that it creates
OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings
OK - Permissions on files must be set properly
OK - Each package must have a %clean section (This is taken care of from F13+
automatically)
OK - Each package must consistently use macros
OK - The package must contain code, or permissible content
OK - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (documentation
goes into the subpackge 'python-swiftclient-doc-1.1.1-1.fc16.noarch.rpm')
OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application
NA - Header files must be in a -devel package -- no devel package
NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package -- no static package
NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives
NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file
OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names.
OK - All file names in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8
OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate.
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------#
Looks good to me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.