https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #71 from Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org> ---
(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #70)
I'm perfectly aware of that, but that is not required for a
Fedora review.
I guess the question is if Tom would like to keep a legal hold on this until
we hear back from the FSF or if we should move forward.
Tom dropped the original FE-Legal hold way back in comment #2.
It was re-added in comment #54, but I see no actual legal questions there: only
technical objections.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component