Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759712
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> 2011-12-16 16:02:36 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I respectfully disagree with changing the macro-in-comment warnings
as they are
in comments copied directly from the existing gcc-python-plugin spec, and
doubled percent signs might be confusing to anyone trying to actually
understand the comments. I'd rather have the rpmlint warnings. However, if
you really feel strongly that those warnings have to be fixed, let me know, and
I'll do it.
What I feel strongly about is that the rpm developers should fix their code so
that rpm doesn't expand macros in comments. :-) As long as those macros don't
cause any actual problems (and I did not notice any), then I am fine with
leaving the comments as they are.
LLVM is supported on i386 and x86_64, which are the current Fedora
Primary
Architectures. The Fedora llvm package spec excludes use of ocaml on s390,
s390x, and sparc64, but does not exclude those or any other architectures.
While I have a hard time believing that LLVM will work on all of the Fedora
Secondary Architectures, if the LLVM spec doesn't exclude them I don't think
the DragonEgg spec needs to either.
That's fine. The DragonEgg spec should definitely follow the llvm spec in this
regard. I just wasn't sure if the llvm spec had any ExcludeArch tags, and was
too lazy to go look.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.