Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621
--- Comment #5 from Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost(a)redhat.com> 2008-09-30 15:34:12 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #4)
The only concern here is that the 32bit built roms on x86_64 will not
be the
same as those used on i386, due to the different optflags in use.
Even before introducing optflags, the x86_64 binaries were not bitwise-equal to
the i386 ones (I didn't check how different they were), I guess there are
differences (small ones, I expect) on the way gcc behaves when running native
32-bit or compiling 32-bit binaries on x86_64. But I don't expect the binaries
to be exactly the same, anyway.
Maybe we could use:
EXTRA_CLFAGS="`echo %{__global_cflags} |sed 's|-fstack-protector||g'`"
That should avoid the -m32/-m64 issues that are causing the failure on x86_64.
That may work.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.