Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565313
--- Comment #2 from Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> 2010-02-15 03:51:46 EST ---
This is intended for embedded development targeting "bare metal", e.g.,
microcontrollers, which is why it is "arm-none-eabi" rather than
"arm-something-linux". It also should be usable for systems running non-Linux
operating systems that are EABI compliant, provided that the user obtains the
appropriate headers and libraries.
The description in the SPEC doesn't say this because I kept the generic
description from the avr-binutils and arm-gp2x-linux binutils, but perhaps it
is justifiable to add a paragraph explaining that it is for embedded/bare metal
use.
I'm working on packaging gcc, gdb, and newlib, but binutils will need to be in
the package collection before I can submit them for review. (Otherwise they
would fail to build due to the binutils dependency.)
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.