https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213588

Sergio Pascual sergio.pasra@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

--- Comment #1 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pasra@gmail.com --- Spec URL: https://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/python-PyAVM.spec SRPM URL: https://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/python-PyAVM-0.9.6-1.fc40.src.rpm

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213588

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Steffan jonathansteffan@gmail.com --- Package Review ==============

Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-Clause License and/or MIT License", "*No copyright* MIT License", "MIT License". 103 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/jon/Reviews/python-PyAVM/licensecheck.txt [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.13/site- packages, /usr/lib/python3.13 [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 4444 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-PyAVM-0.9.6-1.fc42.noarch.rpm python-PyAVM-0.9.6-1.fc42.src.rpm =============================================== rpmlint session starts =============================================== rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpjg7sq357')] checks: 32, packages: 2

python3-PyAVM.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/pyavm/tests/data/ssc2004-06b1-alpha.xml /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/pyavm/tests/data/sig05-021-alpha.xml:/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/pyavm/tests/data/ssc2004-06a1-alpha.xml ========== 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 7 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s ==========

Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1

python3-PyAVM.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/pyavm/tests/data/ssc2004-06b1-alpha.xml /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/pyavm/tests/data/sig05-021-alpha.xml:/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/pyavm/tests/data/ssc2004-06a1-alpha.xml 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 3 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s

Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/P/PyAVM/PyAVM-0.9.6.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : b3b78b3e80070db63db4fb77440e73260f8db93b5557f4aaa54511dcdac6f26d CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b3b78b3e80070db63db4fb77440e73260f8db93b5557f4aaa54511dcdac6f26d

Requires -------- python3-PyAVM (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi)

Provides -------- python3-PyAVM: python-PyAVM python3-PyAVM python3.13-PyAVM python3.13dist(pyavm) python3dist(pyavm)

Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -r -n python-PyAVM-0.9.6-1.fc40.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: R, Java, PHP, Ocaml, Haskell, SugarActivity, Perl, C/C++, fonts Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213588

Jonathan Steffan jonathansteffan@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Steffan jonathansteffan@gmail.com --- APPROVED

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213588

Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-8542355874 (python-PyAVM-0.9.6-2.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-8542355874

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213588

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-8542355874 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-8542355874 *` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-8542355874

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213588

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-c51593112e (python-PyAVM-0.9.6-2.fc39) has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.