https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911780
José Matos <jamatos(a)fc.up.pt> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |jamatos(a)fc.up.pt
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |jamatos(a)fc.up.pt
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from José Matos <jamatos(a)fc.up.pt> ---
The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora.
The spec file is simple and correct.
fedora-review complains:
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION
- Package requires R-core.
The only pattern that I am seeing here is the number of 0.1.1 packages that are
introduced in the updates of R packages. :-)
After reviewing so many packages the other thing that shows up is that probably
the %install section could get a macro on R-rpm-macros since this chunk appears
so many times:
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{rlibdir}
%{_bindir}/R CMD INSTALL -l %{buildroot}%{rlibdir} %{packname}
test -d %{packname}/src && (cd %{packname}/src; rm -f *.o *.so)
rm -f %{buildroot}%{rlibdir}/R.css
The package is approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component