Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189081
tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-04-22 23:35 EST -------
I'm assuming perl-Module-Info will be approved, so I'll go ahead and review this.
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
conforms to the Perl template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
9acb4eb0737bb041e9ece8ad08e127c3 Test-Prereq-1.030.tar.gz
9acb4eb0737bb041e9ece8ad08e127c3 Test-Prereq-1.030.tar.gz-srpm
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, i386).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directory it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present but necessarily disabled.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.