https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277528
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Steffan <jonathansteffan(a)gmail.com> ---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[-]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
Note: Sources not installed
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "GNU General
Public
License, Version 3", "zlib License", "Apache License 1.1",
"MIT
License and/or The Unlicense", "BSD 2-Clause License". 528 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/jon/Reviews/libsurvive/licensecheck.txt
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/udev/rules.d, /usr/lib/udev,
/usr/lib64/pkgconfig
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[!]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 33413 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: libsurvive-1.01^20240123git037189e-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm
libsurvive-devel-1.01^20240123git037189e-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm
libsurvive-debuginfo-1.01^20240123git037189e-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm
libsurvive-debugsource-1.01^20240123git037189e-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm
libsurvive-1.01^20240123git037189e-1.fc41.src.rpm
=============================================== rpmlint session starts
===============================================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp6rjm7zo5')]
checks: 32, packages: 5
libsurvive.src: E: spelling-error ('dof', '%description -l en_US dof ->
dog,
do, of')
libsurvive.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('dof', '%description -l en_US dof ->
dog,
do, of')
libsurvive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sensors-readout
libsurvive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary survive-buttons
libsurvive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary survive-cli
libsurvive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary survive-solver
libsurvive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary survive-websocketd
libsurvive-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary api_example
========= 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings, 76
filtered, 2 badness; has taken 3.0 s ==========
Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: libsurvive-devel-debuginfo-1.01^20240123git037189e-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm
libsurvive-debuginfo-1.01^20240123git037189e-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm
=============================================== rpmlint session starts
===============================================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpq5ka_kgn')]
checks: 32, packages: 2
========= 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 46
filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.8 s ==========
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 5
libsurvive.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('dof', '%description -l en_US dof ->
dog,
do, of')
libsurvive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sensors-readout
libsurvive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary survive-buttons
libsurvive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary survive-cli
libsurvive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary survive-solver
libsurvive.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary survive-websocketd
libsurvive-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary api_example
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings, 93 filtered, 1
badness; has taken 4.0 s
Unversioned so-files
--------------------
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/disambiguator_statebased.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_dummy.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_global_scene_solver.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_playback.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_simulator.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_udp.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_usbmon.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_vive.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/poser_barycentric_svd.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/poser_dummy.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/poser_kalman_only.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/poser_mpfit.so
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/jdavidberger/libsurvive-extras-data/archive/3476af66c4...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
bb45aef8ae57dafd3fc84f89374af7eb0dc9cb15b1e2c24692e78c03a567fc67
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
bb45aef8ae57dafd3fc84f89374af7eb0dc9cb15b1e2c24692e78c03a567fc67
https://github.com/cntools/cnmatrix/archive/5936c62511305227fbd59b2d5a43a...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
e4f1c776c5fbf04374727b6b1c6c32f7226db35fde480468f857df5b6d543f81
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
e4f1c776c5fbf04374727b6b1c6c32f7226db35fde480468f857df5b6d543f81
https://github.com/cntools/cnkalman/archive/6b350314225e28d2e4e8daad7d297...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
e7082c497fb9c76b79f781b3b15147c12a122026a1f3f83a44605132c2766093
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
e7082c497fb9c76b79f781b3b15147c12a122026a1f3f83a44605132c2766093
https://github.com/cntools/libsurvive/archive/037189ebbcdb2a0bedd6fe6a8d1...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
0a354752b02abfefc2394d425656bcc7b0c07d0334e70fca0f4a313c604850a9
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
0a354752b02abfefc2394d425656bcc7b0c07d0334e70fca0f4a313c604850a9
Requires
--------
libsurvive (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/usr/bin/bash
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpcap.so.1()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libsurvive.so.0()(64bit)
libusb-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.7.1)(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
systemd-udev
libsurvive-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/usr/bin/pkg-config
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libsurvive(x86-64)
libsurvive.so.0()(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
libsurvive-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
libsurvive-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides
--------
libsurvive:
bundled(cnkalman)
bundled(cnmatrix)
libsurvive
libsurvive(x86-64)
libsurvive.so.0()(64bit)
libsurvive-devel:
libsurvive-devel
libsurvive-devel(x86-64)
pkgconfig(survive)
libsurvive-debuginfo:
debuginfo(build-id)
libsurvive-debuginfo
libsurvive-debuginfo(x86-64)
libsurvive.so.0.3-1.01^20240123git037189e-1.fc41.x86_64.debug()(64bit)
libsurvive-debugsource:
libsurvive-debugsource
libsurvive-debugsource(x86-64)
Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -r -n
libsurvive-1.01^20240123git037189e-1.fc41.src.rpm
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: C/C++, Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, Perl, Haskell, Python, fonts, PHP,
Ocaml, R
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277528
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...