https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2)
* You are hard-requiring /bin/lsb_release, which upstream says is
not
necessary. Please downgrade it to Recommends, as the lsb package has a large
web of dependencies that people may not necessarily want.
There is a traceback when the binary is not available. So for now, I want to
have there hard requires. I will flip it to Recommends once resolved.
* If you intend to package this for EPEL, you'll need to do a
little bit
more work to support Python 3 in EPEL 6/7. For reference, here's a couple of
examples[1][2].
I plan to create only python2 subpackage for el6 and el7.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component