Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696357
--- Comment #3 from Timur Kristóf <timur(a)sch.bme.hu> 2011-04-15 01:59:17 EDT ---
Hello Mohamed, thank you for reviewing! :)
(In reply to comment #2)
* maybe your package should be renamed «
gnome-shell-extension-fedora-logo » or
« gnome-shell-fedora-logo
Because if I named it like that, people would think that
the package is
provided by upstream (like gnome-shell-extensions), which is not the case. And
if you look at any of such Fedora packages, all of them begin with either the
name "fedora" or a release name. (examples: fedora-icon-theme,
lovelock-backgrounds, laughlin-kde-theme, etc.)
If you still think that the name needs to change, I will rename it.
* the fedora-logos package provides a « system-logos » capacity, as
well as the
generic-logos package (and probably the redhat-logos in RHEL also). Why not
setting system-logos as Requires instead of fedora-logos, so that your package
would be usable without any change in Fedora as well as in any Fedora-derivated
distribution?
Very good point, I wasn't aware of such a possibility.
Currently the extension finds the logo by the icon name 'fedora-logo-icon'. If
you tell me what icon name to use in order to utilize this system-logos
capacity, I will gladly change it. :)
* about the URL tag: why not simply use
http://sources.venemo.net/?
The URL tag
is intended to point to the project website, no matter how small it is. If it's
not the solution you prefer, you could create a basic page in your
fedorapeople.org space (or wherever you can) containing the description of the
package and links to the sources.
I think making a
fedorapeople.org page is a good
idea, I'll make one.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.