Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664624
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mschwendt(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> 2010-12-23 13:22:00 EST
---
After looking at "repoquery --whatrequires libdmapsharing", why not upgrade the
existing libdmapsharing package in Fedora and port the existing API users to
the new API? Instead of introducing a parallel installable package.
And frankly, it there's a compelling reason to keep both, it wouldn't hurt to
package both libraries in the same src.rpm, especially if headers, libraries
and sonames are designed in a way they don't conflict. I think it's overhead to
request a review of something that is in Fedora already as an older version.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.