Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152
Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: jkeating@redhat.com ReportedBy: johnp@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/orca/orca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/orca/orca-0.9.0-1.src.rpm Description: A flexible, scriptable, extensible screen reader for the GNOME platform that provides access via speech synthesis, braille, and magnification.
This is a 200%+ better accessibility library than gnopernicus of which it replaces and has been adopted upstream by GNOME to replace gnopernicus.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152
------- Additional Comments From mclasen@redhat.com 2006-08-28 09:20 EST ------- just to clarify: orca is replacing both gnopernicus and gnome-mag, right ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152
------- Additional Comments From johnp@redhat.com 2006-08-28 11:53 EST ------- Yes it does. I need to add teh obsolete.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152
jkeating@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(johnp@redhat.com)
------- Additional Comments From jkeating@redhat.com 2006-08-28 14:53 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - python_sitelib isn't used, don't define it. - Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]") is no longer needed. Automagically done. - Summary could lose "Orca is a", and the period at the end. - description should have 80char~ linefeeds - Missing BR: perl(XML::Parser) gnome-python2-bonobo gettext - Does orca provide a 'drop in replacement' for gnopernicus? Should it Provides: gnopernicus for upgrade paths? (ditto gnome-mag) - Group listed isn't a standard group from the RPM docs. - Some of the BuildRequires lines have tabs, some have spaces. Pick one (:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152
johnp@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(johnp@redhat.com) |
------- Additional Comments From johnp@redhat.com 2006-08-29 11:33 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/orca/orca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/orca/orca-0.9.0-2.src.rpm
I changed the Groups tag but I belive there should be an accessability group as it is an important segment that we must support. Having the group makes our support that much more visible
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152
jkeating@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(johnp@redhat.com)
------- Additional Comments From jkeating@redhat.com 2006-08-29 12:08 EST ------- Actually the Group tag is used by NOTHING. Anaconda doesn't use it, pirut doesn't use it, yum doesn't use it, etc... It's actually on the chopping block to go away. Comps.xml is where the things get sorted into groups and presented as such.
Hrm, looks like I missed it in the first review. Summary is more than 79 chars, it needs to be shortened. Could probably drop everything from 'for people' on, and caps the first word.
Thats silly stuff you can fix once you import. Approving.
I'm assuming that at the same time I should be blocking gnopernicus and gnome-mag from the collection (and removing from comps if its there)?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152
johnp@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(johnp@redhat.com) |
------- Additional Comments From johnp@redhat.com 2006-08-29 12:13 EST ------- Yes block away.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152
------- Additional Comments From kevin.kofler@chello.at 2006-09-03 12:44 EST -------
Actually the Group tag is used by NOTHING.
I think it is still used by apt-rpm and frontends (e.g. Synaptic).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152
------- Additional Comments From jkeating@redhat.com 2006-09-03 14:26 EST ------- They should be fixed to not use it. Its inconsistant, there is no real control mechanism, there is no support for conditional includes (only include this package if this other package has been selected), etc... Consider it deprecated.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152
sundaram@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE CC| |sundaram@redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From sundaram@redhat.com 2006-09-27 13:30 EST -------
This package has already been approved and imported into Fedora Core but this review report has not been closed yet. Closing it now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Core |Fedora
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org