Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-crack -- Really simple JSON and XML parsing, ripped from Merb and Rails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-crack -- Really simple JSON and XML parsing, ripped from Merb and Rails Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-crack.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Really simple JSON and XML parsing, ripped from Merb and Rails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |624290
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends on|624290 | AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-15 14:27:53 EDT --- Initial comments
* BR / tests - It seems that "BR: rubygem(shoulda)" is only needed when enabling tests. (Currently your srpm builds without "BR: rubygem(shoulda)".
- And, instead would you consider to package rubygem-jnunemaker-matchy to enable tests? It seems that with installing this gem (and modifying Rakefile a bit) all tests seem to succeed.
* Creating -doc - As I said in ruby-sig mailing list, (for this gem) I suggest to create -doc subpackage.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |624290
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Michael Stahnke mastahnke@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |624490
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
--- Comment #2 from Michael Stahnke mastahnke@gmail.com 2010-08-16 12:01:42 EDT --- I'll try to get this modified today.
I did package up jnunemaker-matchy. bug 624490
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Bug 622313 depends on bug 624490, which changed state.
Bug 624490 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-jnunemaker-matchy -- RSpec-esque matchers for use in Test::Unit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624490
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-21 03:55:29 EDT --- As the depending package was imported into Fedora, I appreciate it if you would update this bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
--- Comment #4 from Michael Stahnke mastahnke@gmail.com 2010-08-23 23:30:20 EDT --- http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-crack-0.1.8-2.fc15.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-25 14:25:29 EDT --- Okay.
-------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-crack) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Michael Stahnke mastahnke@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Michael Stahnke mastahnke@gmail.com 2010-08-25 18:03:56 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-crack Short Description: Really simple JSON and XML parsing, ripped from Merb and Rails Owners: stahnma Branches: F12 F13 F14 EL5 EL6 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-08-27 15:13:51 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 23:23:38 EDT --- rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 23:23:47 EDT --- rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-09 00:10:32 EDT --- rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-crack'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2010-09-09 13:21:19
--- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-09-09 13:21:19 EDT --- Closing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-17 14:30:04 EDT --- rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc13 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-23 08:32:30 EDT --- rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc13 |rubygem-crack-0.1.8-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622313
Bug 622313 depends on bug 624290, which changed state.
Bug 624290 Summary: Build package on F-14/13/12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624290
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|NEW |CLOSED
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org