Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
sander(a)hoentjen.eu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |sander(a)hoentjen.eu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From sander(a)hoentjen.eu 2006-09-08 07:03 EST -------
GOOD
- package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
- specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
- dist tag is present.
- build root is correct.
- license field matches the actual license.
- license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
- source files match upstream: 39a07295c78699da6efc1e4638c53688
- BuildRequires are proper.
- package builds in mock (x86_64).
- rpmlint is silent.
- final provides and requires are sane:
python-telepathy-0.13.2-1.fc6.noarch.rpm
python-telepathy = 0.13.2-1.fc6
=
python(abi) = 2.4
- no shared libraries are present.
- package is not relocatable.
- owns the directories it creates.
- doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
- no duplicates in %files.
- file permissions are appropriate.
- %clean is present.
- no scriptlets present.
- code, not content.
- documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
- %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
- no headers.
- no pkgconfig files.
- no libtool .la droppings.
- not a GUI app.
- not a web app.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.