Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986
--- Comment #11 from Christian Krause <chkr(a)plauener.de> 2009-11-20 16:35:00 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #10)
I think it would be wrong to add dependencies for packages only
available on
rpmfusion. I'm not sure about it, but I think it would be impossible to install
this package without having enabled rpmfusion.
Yes, I fully agree now.... ;-)
I think it's better to make the dependencies as good as possible.
If there are
any products which use this packages they should care about the required
dependencies.
Hm, I think I disagree with this statement. IMHO the packages in Fedora should
follow these rules:
- the requirements of a package should include all prerequisites which are
necessary to use the package (this includes e.g. the native libraries which are
used by the late binding in C#) - if a package would not be usable without
another one, it must be included in the requirements
- a Fedora package must be installable on a Fedora-only system
Given these two rules, there would be only the one solution to exclude these
bindings which need native libs from rpmfusion completely and - if needed -
package them in rpmfusion. I know, this would somehow "split" the taoframework
package - but IMHO this would be the best solution.
Do you think this would be a reasonable way?
Otherwise the package looks good.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.