Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Alias
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202876
tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-08-17 20:38 EST -------
You should be careful with that method of requires filtering, because there's no
guarantee that __perl_provides will always be /usr/lib/rpm/perl.prov. The
safest method is detailed in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl.
That said, many modules do use it and it is relatively simple.
Other than that there's not much to say.
* source files match upstream:
390fc2fefbf3fa9bf30d482a46989953 Data-Alias-1.0.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
Alias.so()(64bit)
perl(Data::Alias) = 1.0
perl-Data-Alias = 1.0-1.fc6
=
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
perl(Data::Alias) = 1.0
perl(DynaLoader)
perl(Exporter)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
All tests successful, 1 test skipped.
Files=26, Tests=561, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.78 cusr + 0.25 csys = 1.03 CPU)
The skipped test checks for the //= operator and won't run otherwise; I think
that's a Perl6 thing.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.