Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591190
Oron Peled <oron(a)actcom.co.il> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |oron(a)actcom.co.il
--- Comment #5 from Oron Peled <oron(a)actcom.co.il> 2010-10-11 20:00:19 EDT ---
Fixed comment 3:
debhelper.src:11: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1,
tab: line
11)
Done
Requires: man is not needed.
Removed
%doc examples/ doc/ could be changed to %doc examples/ doc/*.
Done
BuildRequires: dpkg-devel seems not needed,
Removed (Also
Debian does not list dpkg-dev as BR of debhelper)
also po4a is not available in fedora.
po4a is in Fedora
(comment 4), so it was added as a BuildRequires.
For man page, lang(locale) should add before %{_mandir}/locale/
or use gettext (%find_lang --with-man)
Done.
SPEC URL:
http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/debhelper.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/debhelper-8.0.0-1.fc13.src.rpm
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint ./debhelper.spec
/usr/local/src/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/debhelper-8.0.0-1.fc13.src.rpm
/usr/local/src/rpmbuilder/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/debhelper-8.0.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
debhelper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US debconf -> deb conf,
deb-conf, debonair
debhelper.noarch: E: devel-dependency dpkg-devel
debhelper.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US debconf -> deb conf,
deb-conf, debonair
debhelper.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/debhelper-8.0.0/examples/rules.multi2
debhelper.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/debhelper-8.0.0/examples/rules.multi
debhelper.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/debhelper-8.0.0/examples/rules.arch
debhelper.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/debhelper-8.0.0/examples/rules.indep
debhelper.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/debhelper-8.0.0/examples/rules.tiny
debhelper.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/debhelper-8.0.0/examples/rules.multi2 /usr/bin/make
debhelper.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/debhelper-8.0.0/examples/rules.multi /usr/bin/make
debhelper.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/debhelper-8.0.0/examples/rules.arch /usr/bin/make
debhelper.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/debhelper-8.0.0/examples/rules.indep /usr/bin/make
debhelper.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/debhelper-8.0.0/examples/rules.tiny /usr/bin/make
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 12 warnings.
Notes:
* The examples/ directory contain "debian/rules" files which are, by
definition executable "scripts" run by /usr/bin/make
[10 out of 12 rpmlint warnings]
* rpmlint spell warning about "debconf"
[2 out of 12 rpm warnings, one from SRPM, another from RPM]
* Dependency devel rpmlint error is unjustified, since debhelper
is a devel package itself.
My fixes are meant to help unblock bug 591192 and eventually, bug 591388.
I am willing to co-maintain these packages if needed.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.