https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #17 from Han Frederic han@math.jussieu.fr ---
%{_datadir}/applications and %{_datadir}/pixmaps are owned by a main system package (filesystem). Your package doesn't need to own them.
Verify with command:
yum provides /usr/share/pixmaps /usr/share/applications
good, so the answer is dir of the package filesystem must not be owned by our package
/usr/share/icons is not in the review log (comment#14) and should not be owned by your package.
Yes it was an example for my question
Not even /usr/share/mime and /usr/share/mime/packages. Sorry, I had not noted the latter ones.
Sorry I am lost, do I missunderstand the comma presentation?
/usr/share/mime and /usr/share/mime/packages look to be in your review of
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/mimetypes, /usr/share/giac/doc/de, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps, /usr/share/mime, <<<===here?=== .... /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/mimetypes, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16, /usr/share/icons/hicolor, /usr/share/mime/packages, <<<===here?=== .... but they belong to: shared-mime-info-1.2-2.fc21.x86_64 so was I right to package those dir?
About 5. I removed the extra +x, and add a warning about the .xws Indeed, they are not text files, they are saved examples from xcas and any uft8 conversion will give a mess. Is there some way to mark them as non text files to avoid those warning? All the best.
I think we can just ignore all file-not-utf8 warnings ;)
Good!