https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922
--- Comment #11 from Benjamin Kircher benjamin.kircher@gmail.com --- Hi Michael. Thank you for looking into this.
- I think license is GPLv2+, not GPLv2
It's useless to write that without giving a rationale.
Have you pointed "fedora-review -b 1398922" at this ticket yet to see which test results it comes up with?
Not sure if you asked Igor or me here (Igor, I presume). I don't want to get ahead of things here but anyway: Yes I did just now.
rpmlint reports 3 errors (incorrect-fsf-address) and lots of warnings (partially useful) i.e., about those unversioned so-files in the package.
For your convenience, please find results here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bkircher/uftrace-fedora/master/review.txt
Things I should fix (I guess, waiting for input from you guys here):
1) These BR are not needed: gcc 2) Unversioned so-files not in -devel subpackage. Should we open a ticket with Fedora Packaging Committee as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#... because of that?