https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953633
--- Comment #12 from Mark Wielaard <mjw(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
Hi Neal,
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #10)
If you expect *users* to use it, then make man pages and document it
and fix
the weird ".sh" name for "find-debuginfo". Otherwise, move it to
"%{_libexecdir}/debugedit" and deal with making it available in
"%{_bindir}"
later once you've sorted it out.
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #11)
To note, I specifically disagree with the premise that debugedit is
documented. It is not. However, *you are upstream*, so I can convey these
issues to you directly to resolve them.
I do believe things are documented, just not with man pages, which I agree we
should add for the 1.0 release.
I understand your reasons for believing libexecdir/debugedit is a better choice
than bindir. If you want my personal opinion then I believe bindir is the right
place for now. You can try to convince me otherwise, but I am not the only
upstream hackers and I think the discussion and decision where to install
things should be made upstream. And if it changes upstream then I'll obviously
change the spec to follow that.
So, does that mean this is the only issue you see with the current spec?
Thanks,
Mark
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component