Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2008-11-26 14:37:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11)
Therefore, my pam rules are not working the way I wanted, but I do not know how to fix them ... For now, only local users can authenticate.
Any suggestion? Do you know how pam works?
Not sure. Is this something you're adding on, or functionality of the original code?
I borrowed the idea from Gentoo and Ubuntu. They created this script so people do not need to have a local account on the server. By what I have read about Pam, it can use this scheme.
# partimaged user database auth sufficient pam_userdb.so db=/etc/partimaged/passwd
But I always get a "password mismatch".
I'm not sure I like the security implications of this. This would mean that if you run partimage-server on your network, anyone on your network with a Fedora LiveCD with this installed can dump images on your server.
I added a README.Fedora.html (I chose html, because it has some useful links).
Good idea. But rename to partimage.README.html to avoid use of the word Fedora and SRPM clobbering.
I have updated the release:
Spec: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/partimage.spec
SRPM: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/partimage-0.6.7-3.fc8.src.rpm
Also, for partimaged-certs.cnf, you should mention in the README that this file should be customized. Not everyone is in Rio. :)