https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138486
--- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca dcavalca@fb.com --- (In reply to Jakub Kadlčík from comment #1)
Looks good to me, I won't block the review because of this. But can you please create an upstream issue asking them to publish tags on GitHub?
https://github.com/svisser/crossword/issues/4
Also, I am not quite sure how to validate that the commit corresponds to the PyPI package. Can you please explain, how you do it? I would like to write some code to `fedora-review` or create a separate script for this.
The heuristics I use are roughly: - check when the pypi package was published and find a commit on/around that date - ideally look for a commit that updates or sets a version that matches with the pypi one - compare the contents of the tree at the commit with the contents of the pypi source (assuming there is a source, as some packages -- not this one thankfully -- only publish wheels)
Put together, these usually surface enough clues to find a good candidate, but I'm not sure how easy it would be to automate this process.
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(ipuz)'
The python-ipuz package was reviewed in RHBZ 2138047 and is now in testing repositories. But I think we should wait until it gets to stable and we can successfully build this package.
Is that okay with you?
Yup, that's totally fine. Thanks!