https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328350
--- Comment #2 from Scott K Logan logans@cottsay.net --- re Licensing:
Good catch. I think the Fedora guidelines[1] are actually pretty clear here. The package should be dual-licensed and annotated, which I have changed.
re Naming:
I had hoped to follow the other ROS underlay packages, but maybe the right move is to migrate them to the current naming scheme. In any case, I changed the package to be called python-osrf-pycommon (this had the side effect of making rpmlint happier).
Spec URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/python-osrf-pycommon/python-osrf-pycommon.s...
SRPM URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/python-osrf-pycommon/python-osrf-pycommon-0...
koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13882771
rpmlint output: 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Thanks,
--scott
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/Li...