https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369244
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #4)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> (In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #1)
> > Package Review
> > ==============
> >
> > Legend:
> > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> > [ ] = Manual review needed
> >
> > Issues
> > ------
> > - The LICENSE file contains only link to license, not the license text. ASL
> > 2.0
> > requires that a copy of the license itself is distributed alongside the
> > software.
>
> Upstream it does not provide the original ASL license because as already
> said several times to (Tatu S.) do not want to increase the size of their
> libraries in Android environment
Adding it to sources won't increase their library size. They just need to
have it in the top directory and not in resources, so it won't end up in
JARs.
I'm fine with having it as another source before they respond.
Yes, i know not
realize most of the times I did this,
but them (him) do not want
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component