Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800
--- Comment #20 from Felix Schwarz felix.schwarz@oss.schwarz.eu 2010-08-07 14:02:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18)
- Release number
- Please use <integer>%{?dist} for Release number (expect for some
exceptions) (2%{?dist}, for example).
Yes that should be updated, I just put my numbers behind the dist tag to make sure I get the official Fedora RPM through updates...
- python_sitelib v.s. python_sitearch
24 # Actually the main package is noarch but -gnome and -kwallet contain
- Well, however on x86_64 files in even main package are also installed under %python_sitearch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2327573
Do you have a proposal how to fix that? As I wrote in the spec file: "Actually the main package is noarch but -gnome and -kwallet contain architecture-specific code. Currently it's impossible to have a noarch main package with arch-specific subpackages. Therefore we can't use 'noarch' here."
I'd be delighted if we can have a noarch main package with arch-specific code.