https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055394
--- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+fdr@sylvestre.me --- Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/ocaml/ocaml-cppo.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/ocaml/ocaml-cppo-0.9.3-2.fc20.src.rpm
✗ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-20-x86_64-cppo/result/*x86*rpm ocaml-cppo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) preprocessor -> processor, predecessor, process's ocaml-cppo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US preprocessor -> processor, predecessor, process's ocaml-cppo.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cppo 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #1)
The first eight issues are repeats from the previous two reviews:
- Remove the internal dependency generator workarounds.
... 8)
Done
- A '#' character at the start of a line in %description is interpreted as a comment. Check the output of rpm -qi on the binary RPM. There is a blank line where "#ext directives." should appear. Unfortunately, rpm does not appear to have a sane way to escape that character, so I think you will be forced to reflow the text. (At least, I could not figure out how to
esacpe it; e.g. "#ext directives." in the source appears exactly like that in the output.)
Turns out there are other Unicode characters that also encode similar pound signs, I've substituted one of them instead
- Does this package really BR ocaml-ocamldoc? Certainly, no documentation generated by ocaml-ocamldoc is being installed.
Good point; package builds fine without this. Removed.