Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: python26-psycopg2 : psycopg2 Postgres client code for python26 on
EPEL5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574586
Summary: Review Request: python26-psycopg2 : psycopg2 Postgres
client code for python26 on EPEL5
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dmalcolm(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Spec URL:
http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-psycopg2.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/python26-psycopg2-2.0.14-...
Note: this is purely intended for the EPEL5 branch, not for Fedora
Description:
I'm working on a python2.6 stack, parallel-installable with the main 2.4 stack.
This is python-psycopg2-2.0.14-1 from EPEL5 reworked somewhat so that it builds
against python2.6, rather than python2.4
Diff versus that specfile:
http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/epel-packaging/from-python-psycopg2-2.0....
The rpmlint output is clean, apart from this warning (due to the dist tag):
python26-psycopg2.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.14-2
2.0.14-2.el5
The "License" of that package appears to be LGPL version 3 or later, with an
exception.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing says "Please be sure that
any exceptions are approved by emailing them to fedora-legal-list(a)redhat.com
first." I haven't done that yet; was this done for python-psycopg2?
The original review request for python-psycopg2 was bug 199784.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.