https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038591
Igor Raits <igor.raits(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(igor.raits@gmail. |
|com) |
--- Comment #7 from Igor Raits <igor.raits(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5)
(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #4)
> (In reply to Maxwell G from comment #3)
> > Are you licensing this under GPLv3+, because that's the license of the
> > ansible package? I think it can also be argued that this is MIT, because
> > that's Fedora's implicit license. You might want to check with Igor
Raits,
> > the original author of the macros/generators[1], about the licensing.
> > Honestly, I think it's problematic that Fedora relies on implicit licenses
> > while still recommending that upstream ships explicit license files, but I
> > don't know the full context surrounding this decision.
>
> He contributed those and did not add a "and MIT" or note that they were
MIT,
> so I thought it was pretty clear that he wanted them to be contributed under
> GPLv3+ like ansible.
> I agree we can confirm with him tho...
>
Easy enough to check... Igor, do you want these MIT licensed instead or
GPLv3+ as Ansible does?
I'm fine with either :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038591