https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836617
--- Comment #3 from Igor Raits <igor.raits(a)gmail.com> ---
- subpackage for the binary is called "pommes", but the
binary name is "mvn-genbr", I think those two names should match
Not
really, I think it is better to call it pommes, because that is how people
would theoretically install it via cargo: `cargo install pommes` would give
them mvn-genbr.
- no License tag for the binary subpackage that contains the
effective license for the binary
I had this done locally, but seems forgot updating
remove spec. Done now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component