https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049689
Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jkadlcik(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com> ---
Thank you for the package,
License: Apache-2.0
The licensecheck found also:
*No copyright* OpenSSL License
------------------------------
awscrt-0.16.12/crt/aws-lc/crypto/fipsmodule/bn/asm/x86_64-gcc.c
BSD 3-Clause License
--------------------
awscrt-0.16.12/crt/aws-lc/crypto/x509v3/v3_pci.c
awscrt-0.16.12/crt/aws-lc/crypto/x509v3/v3_pcia.c
BSD 3-Clause License Apache License 2.0
---------------------------------------
awscrt-0.16.12/crt/aws-c-common/source/posix/time.c
CMU License
-----------
awscrt-0.16.12/crt/s2n/pq-crypto/kyber_r3/KeccakP-brg_endian_avx2.h
And many different files under many different licenses. Attaching the
whole file, so you can see for yourself. Should we add them to the
License field? If yes, please add a comment to the spec file,
describing what license applies to what files.
# the code is not big endian friendly
ExcludeArch: s390x
According to the packaging guidelines
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_...
Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not
compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be
placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New
packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so
they should put this description in the comment until the package is
approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long
explanation with the bug number.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049689