Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476
--- Comment #10 from Louis Lagendijk louis@lagendijk.xs4all.nl 2009-05-30 16:46:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9)
For 0.5.4-1:
- cups_backend_dir
- Well, according to cups.spec on Fedora %cups_backend_dir is %{_exec_prefix}/lib/cups, not %{_libdir}/cups/backend ( note that on 64 bit architecture, %_exec_prefix is /usr, while %_libdir is /usr/lib64 )
corrected. I got misled by the description of the macros on the Wiki. Using the same as what cups does is indeed the bet way. Thanks!
- %setup
- "%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}" can be replaced by "%setup -q"
Corrected
Then:
NOTE: Before being sponsored:
This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you.
Thanks for the offer. I will start working on some reviews and/or other packages as soon as possible. I seem to have picked a bad time to apply as packager with first a holiday and now a business trip coming up. But first there is an updated package version available: Spec URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp-0.5.4-2.fc10.src.rpm
Thanks for your excellent input, guidance and review!