Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libhugetlbfs - easy access to huge pages of memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196057
nacc@us.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED CC| |nacc@us.ibm.com Flag|needinfo? |
------- Additional Comments From nacc@us.ibm.com 2006-06-23 13:24 EST ------- RE: hugetlbd always being 32-bit. Yes, that is intentional. The original reason was to avoid having to always ask bug submitters which version of the daemon were you running. But, given that a 64-bit user could install both the 64-bit and 32-bit libhugetlbfs packages, this also happens to avoid deciding which hugetlbd should exist, right (as both obj32/hugetlbd and obj64/hugetlbd would be installed into the same location)?