https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010172
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- The fedora-review tool is reporting one issue
Issues: ======= - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /var/lib/copr- rpmbuild/results/hwk/diff.txt See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/
The diff.txt looks like this
diff -U2 -r /home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/upstream-unpacked/Source0/hwk-0.6/hwk.cabal /home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/srpm-unpacked/hwk-0.6.tar.gz-extract/hwk-0.6/hwk.cabal --- /home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/upstream-unpacked/Source0/hwk-0.6/hwk.cabal 2001-09-09 03:46:40.000000000 +0200 +++ /home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/srpm-unpacked/hwk-0.6.tar.gz-extract/hwk-0.6/hwk.cabal 2001-09-09 03:46:40.000000000 +0200 @@ -13,5 +13,5 @@ maintainer: Jens Petersen juhpetersen@gmail.com copyright: 2016-2017 Lukas Martinelli, - 2020-2021 Jens Petersen + 2020 Jens Petersen category: Development build-type: Simple diff -U2 -r /home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/upstream-unpacked/Source0/hwk-0.6/README.md /home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/srpm-unpacked/hwk-0.6.tar.gz-extract/hwk-0.6/README.md --- /home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/upstream-unpacked/Source0/hwk-0.6/README.md 2001-09-09 03:46:40.000000000 +0200 +++ /home/jkadlcik/2010172-hwk/srpm-unpacked/hwk-0.6.tar.gz-extract/hwk-0.6/README.md 2001-09-09 03:46:40.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ # hwk ![MIT licensed](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue.svg)
+<img align="right" alt="hwk" src="hwk.png" /> + **hwk** (pronounced "hawk") is a simple Haskell-based commandline text processing tool, somewhat similar to tools like *awk*, *grep*, *sed*. `hwk` applies composed pure Haskell functions to a list of lines of input, enabling text processing without having to remember an obscure DSL or awkward cli options. This tool can also help to encourage people to think functionally.
-<img align="right" alt="[hawk image]" src="hwk.png" /> - hwk was originally written by Lukas Martinelli in 2016-2017: see the [original README file](README.md.orig).
There is a difference only in metadata so it shouldn't cause any problems but I am more worried about why there is this sources mismatch in the first place.
Do you understand how it happened?