Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851
------- Additional Comments From jochen@herr-schmitt.de 2007-10-09 10:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1)
kaya.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 The licensing page specifies "LGPLv2" even for 2.1.
The headers are OK, although it would probably be cleaner if they were grouped together in a subdirectory instead of strewn through /usr/lib/kaya.
Done,
Binaries named /usr/bin/rekey and /usr/bin/xml2man seem destined to conflict with something. /usr/bin/xml2man is present on macos and some Linux distros but doesn't actually seem to be in Fedora. /usr/bin/rekey amazingly doesn't conflict with anything. Still, both names are awfully generic for binaries that are specific to this package. Is there any reasonable chance of getting them renamed with a prefix like "kaya-"?
I think, this is a design issue from the upstream and I don't try to make a rename, because I afraid to confused poeple who try to use the tutorials.
Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya-0.2.6-2.fc7.src.rpm