Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Fedora Directory Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228555
------- Additional Comments From rmeggins@redhat.com 2007-02-14 13:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5)
W: fedora-ds invalid-license GPL plus extensions W: fedora-ds-devel invalid-license GPL plus extensions W: fedora-ds-debuginfo invalid-license GPL plus extensions W: fedora-ds invalid-license GPL plus extensions
Perhaps should use just GPL as the license tag?
I don't want to give people the impression that the license is just plain old GPL. The extension is important for those people who want to write and distribute plugins with the directory server. So if there is some other way to indicate that, I'm open to suggestions.
- %check is not present; There is no test code in the districution.
We're still working on that, being able to open source our test suites. Is it necessary to have something for %check?