https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235305
--- Comment #10 from Sören Möller soerenmoeller2001@gmail.com --- Hi Jeff
Thanks for the comments.
(In reply to Jeff Backus from comment #8)
(In reply to Sören Möller from comment #4)
- Thank you for the license clarification, I think I agree that all of the
files are under licenses that are fine for Fedora. I am just in doubt, what should be written in the License-field of the spec file. I think "BSD" (which is the short name for both BSD (2 clause) and BSD (3 clause) is correct, but hope the "real" reviewer will be more certain.
My understanding is that the 2-clause and 3-clause forms are considered interchangeable. Regardless, both have the same shorthand in the license table, so the answer is "BSD".
OK, that makes sense, thank you.
- I am unsure how to chekck if "%build honors applicable compiler flags or
justifies otherwise.", although I think it does as it does what I expected in build.log and no obvious changes in the spec-file
I compare the contents of build.log with the appropriate optflags line in /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc.
Thank you for the pointer, I didn't know that /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc was the appropriate place to look, and will use that for future revies.
Best Sören