Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668
--- Comment #19 from Martin-Gomez Pablo pablo.martin-gomez@laposte.net 2009-04-11 12:32:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #17)
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
==> NOT OK The actual license seems to be "GPLv2" and not "GPLv2+"
COPYING included in this package is GPLv2 and there is no way to distinguish, it this means "GPLv2 only" or "GPLv2+". In cases like these you need to look at the sourcecode and src/utils.c states:
Copyright 2008 PCMan <pcman.tw@gmail.com>
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
So the actual license really is GPLv2+.
Thanks for the advice, I didn't think about checking the source code. So you can begin the CVS procedure.