https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052939
Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pemensik(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> ---
Why is this package called libfungw, when upstream repository and page refers
to it only as fungw? Does that conflict with existing fedora package? I think
fungw is better name for the package.
Why do you have %{name}-perl aliases and then use
%package -n %{libperl} ??
%package perl
without -n produces just %{name}-perl by default. It is simpler, cleaner and
easier to read. Unless different prefix is required, use just suffixes for
subpackages.
There are multiple definitions not really required.
Just use:
%package perl
Requires: %{name}...
%description perl
Blabla
%files perl
%{_bindir}/whatever
It the application uses dlopen, I think it should have own subdirectory
%{_libdir}/%{name}, where it would store its own shared code/libraries.
%_libdir is reserved for libraries used by ld.so.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052939