Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667
Marek Mahut mmahut@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut@redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mmahut@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut mmahut@redhat.com 2010-01-03 13:34:55 EDT --- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - Do we need to have it as specific server sub-package? - Spec file looks sane. - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - License field in spec matches the content of tarball - License file included in package matches used code. - BuildRequires are correct - Builds in mock for rawhide, installation too. - Rpmlint is clean.
This package looks sane, approved.