Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372
--- Comment #38 from D Haley mycae@yahoo.com 2009-09-12 03:58:08 EDT --- Response from upstream:
On the still continuing package approval process for Fedora, the licencing issues have been re-raised.
Namely, the copyright included with the mathGL spec is not internally consistent.
The COPYING file is GPLv3, the COPYRIGHT file is GPLv2 and the source code is "version 2 or any later"
Is it possible to clarify in the source repository, exactly which licence is intended?
Yes, it should be GPL v.2 or later (as in source code) -- I forgot to change COPYRIGHT and COPYING :(
I think that is now quite clear :)