https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970213
Jakub Filak jfilak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfilak@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Filak jfilak@redhat.com --- The package produces unowned directories:
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyfros/plugins file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyfros/plugins is not owned by any package
Adding these lines to the spec file would help: %dir %{python_sitelib}/pyfros %dir %{python_sitelib}/pyfros/plugins %dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}-py2.7.egg-info
But you can achieve this goal in various ways: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Byte_compiling
rpmlint found these relevant issues: fros.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) screencasting -> screen casting, screen-casting, screenwriting fros.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pluggable -> plug gable, plug-gable, plugged fros.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backends -> back ends, back-ends, backhands fros.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US screencasting -> screen casting, screen-casting, screenwriting fros.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pluggable -> plug gable, plug-gable, plugged fros.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backends -> back ends, back-ends, backhands fros.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fros
I'm not a linguist but I would say that spelling errors should be fixed (packaging guidelines requires American English). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#summary
Please consider adding a man page for fros binary. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Man_pages
Regards Jakub