Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683638
--- Comment #4 from Tavis Aitken tavisto@gmail.com 2011-03-28 11:05:05 EDT --- Fabian, Thanks for the review.
- Why not place all doc files on one line?
- The docs are all separate so they can be easily reviewed or removed if the source changes. I can change it if that is the recommended way to do things.
e website says "This version requires elasticsearch 0.12 or above.".
elasticsearch is not available in the Fedora Package Collection. This will make it hard for reviewer to test the package.
- This is a client library for Elasticsearch, which is not packaged in Fedora as of yet because it requires some newer versions of Lucene ( 3.0.0 tree ) and other java projects that are not packaged. I have built a package that can be used but do not meet the Fedora packaging requirements as of now. I have plans to try and make it Fedora compatible but have not managed it as of yet.
https://github.com/tavisto/elasticsearch-rpms/blob/master/SPECS/elasticsearc...