https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759
Jeremy Newton alexjnewt@fastmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(trix@redhat.com)
--- Comment #9 from Jeremy Newton alexjnewt@fastmail.com --- OK sorry, one more update: Spec URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocclr.spec SRPM URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocclr-5.5.1-4.fc39.src.rpm copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mystro256/rocm-hip/build/5989231/
I added a new "hip" package as it turns out hipcc and hipconfig are used at runtime, such as with Blender. Now doing "sudo dnf install rocm-hip" will allow for running blender without any issue on my system. The only caveat is that blender checks for "libamdhip64.so" instead of "libamdhip64.so.5" or similar, so I moved the libamdhip64.so symlink to the rocm-hip package to workaround this issue. This introduces a devel-file-in-non-devel-package rpmlint warning.
Excluding that, I got the rpmlint out down to just a few no-manual-page-for-binary and no-documentation warnings, which I think can be ignored.
As well, I used the following to add a requires on rocm-device-libs for hipcc but I did it in a way to silence a rpmlint explicit-lib-dependency warning:
# hipcc requirements: Requires: %{_libdir}/amdgcn/bitcode
It seems ok to me since hipcc now looks for this directory due to the sed patchwork in %prep, but I can change it back to "rocm-device-libs" if you don't like adding directory requires like this.
@trix, what do you think?