Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800
--- Comment #15 from Felix Schwarz felix.schwarz@oss.schwarz.eu 2010-06-26 05:57:14 EDT --- Ratnadeep Debnath: Are you still interested in packaging python-keyring? I'm feeling a bit bad here just to hijack this review. Ratnadeep, please tell me if you're still interested - I'll step back then. If you don't have time right now, I'd like to take over.
However as I needed this package for my private workflow, I modified the spec file quite a bit so that it complies to Fedora's guidelines, see http://www.felix-schwarz.name/files/misc/2010/python-keyring-0.2-1.fc13.2.sr... I think it is better than the previously linked versions.
There is one pylint error which I can't fix: python-keyring.x86_64: E: no-binary
As far as I know, it is not possible to have a noarch main package with arch-specific subpackages. Therefore the main package is not 'noarch' even though it does not contain binary files. Can we ignore this?
I don't understand pylint's invalid url warning. I suspect it tries to do a HEAD request which the web site does not support. The url is perfectly fine though.