https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140195
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt bugs.michael@gmx.net ---
Who is pkcarlisle-dot-com behind?
Write it more as a real name in all places, in the bugzilla account preferences, in the spec file %changelog: "P.K. Carlisle" would be one expected way to write it. Don't use "pkcarlisle-dot-com" even if it resembles your full name.
I really can't figure out what this package is. It violates FHS as well:
It doesn't even build. That's no surprise, because no source code archive is included. The spec file accesses paths/files not included in the src.rpm.
As a minimum, people who submit packages for review should examine a few Fedora packages (via src.rpms or git) and follow well-known documentation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Maintainers
Notice the index at the bottom.
Buildroot: %{_sourcedir}
I would estimate that none of the many thousand Fedora (and Red Hat) packages does it like that, especially since the purpose of the "Buildroot" is a different one and clearly _not_ the same as %_sourcedir. Nowadays, one doesn't set this tag anymore, btw:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag