Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797
D Haley mycae@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kwizart@gmail.com | |) |
--- Comment #3 from D Haley mycae@yahoo.com 2008-12-19 21:11:41 EDT --- I hope no-one minds, but I have taken the liberty of updating this package, as it is blocking a package that I am keen to complete.
SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jrosetta-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jrosetta-1.0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm
*Sat Dec 20 2008 <mycae(a!t)yahoo.com> 1.0.1-2 - Fix build paths to prevent setup from asking for user input after multiple builds - Refresh source to match MD5. - Update patch to match path change - Corrected licence from GPL2+ to GPL2
I agree with the symlinking, as this is done in many java packages, where the version of interest is installed in %{name}-%{version}.jar, and then a symlink is made to this from %{name}.jar . Unless I have mis-interpreted the intent of the command.