https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188867
Bug ID: 2188867
Summary: Review Request: icedtea-web - Open Source
implementation of JSR-56 better known as Java Web
Start
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/icedtea-web.spec
SRPM URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/icedtea-web-1.8.8-1.src.rpm
Description: The IcedTea-Web project provides a free software implementation of
Java Web Start, originally based on the NetX, project. IcedTea's NetX currently
supports verification of signed jars, trusted certificate storing, system
certificate store checking, and provides the services specified by the jnlp
API. In addition it also provides a full desktop integration, an offline run,
many extended security features, an own policy editor and much more.
Fedora Account System Username: robert
Note: As of writing this package is only intended for EPEL 9.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188867
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214269
Bug ID: 2214269
Summary: openssl-pkcs11-sign-provider: OpenSSL 3.0 provider for
pkcs#11 (private key operations only)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: dengler(a)linux.ibm.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1970417
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1970417&action=edit
Specfile
Description:
The openssl-pkcs11-sign-provider is a provider module for openssl v3.0, which
uses the PKCS#11 API to perform operations (sign/decrypt) with private
asymmetric keys. The main purpose of the openssl-pkcs11-sign-provider is to
provide TLS applictions (e.g. web-servers) access to sensitive key material,
which is stored in secure PKCS#11 tokens.
The openssl-pkcs11-sign-provider can be used on any architecture and with any
implementation of the PKCS#11 standard (v3.0). At the moment, most of
development and test has been done with opencryptoki.
Operations with public asymmetric keys are re-directed to a (configurable)
built-in provider. Symmetric operations are not supported.
Fedora Account System Username: dengler
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.0.0
Additional info:
upstream project:
https://github.com/opencryptoki/openssl-pkcs11-sign-provider
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214269
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215644
Bug ID: 2215644
Summary: Review Request: VirtualBox - powerful x86 and
AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as
well as home use.
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: lost(a)biitle.nl
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I've been using GNOME Boxes as a GUI for QEMU on my computer, but recently it
broke. I think adding VirtualBox to the Fedora 38 repositories would really
help people that are having the same problem as me. VirtualBox is also not
available on Flathub.
Thanks.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215644
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…