[Bug 1601186] New: Review Request:
wpewebkit - A WebKit port optimized for low-end devices
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601186
Bug ID: 1601186
Summary: Review Request: wpewebkit - A WebKit port optimized
for low-end devices
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: bunnyapoc(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bunnyapocalypse/WPE-webki...
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bunnyapocalypse/WPE-webki...
Description: WPE allows embedders to create simple and performant systems based
on Web platform technologies. It is designed with hardware acceleration in
mind, leveraging common 3D graphics APIs for best performance. This is also
kind-of my first package (my other one being the backend for this package,
found here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601058), and I still
need a sponsor.
Fedora Account System Username: bunnyapocalypse
Additional info: I am unable to show that this builds successfully on koji
servers etc as it depends on wpebackend, a package which has not yet been
packaged yet. I can, however, verify that it does build properly on my personal
computer once I have installed the backend from the copr repository that I've
made for it.
2.) I am unsure if some of the patches included in the webkit2gtk3 package that
I based this spec file off of
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/webkit2gtk3/blob/master/f/webkit2gtk3....)
were needed for this package, nor how to go about adding those should they be
necessary as they were all made for webkit2gtk3. I have an inkling that some of
them, specifically the fedora-crypto-policy and python2 patch are necessary.
3.) Finally, to make the package build on my machine I had to add a cmake
option on line 102 of the spec that I feel is probably not ideal, so any advice
on that would be welcome.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5 years, 10 months
[Bug 1605156] New: Review Request:
python-bundled-wheels - Wheels to be bundled with Python tools for virtual
environments
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605156
Bug ID: 1605156
Summary: Review Request: python-bundled-wheels - Wheels to be
bundled with Python tools for virtual environments
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-bundled-wheels.spec
SRPM URL:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-bundled-wheels-0-1.fc28....
Description:
The purpose of this package is to build various Python wheels to be bundled
with Python tools for virtual environments, instead of taking prebuilt bundled
wheels from upstreams. This also allows to deduplicate the wheels and specify
the licenses better (no need to specify them in the projects that need those).
Fedora Account System Username: churchyard
Rationale: We bundle a lot of wheels in Fedora and we don't even rebuild them.
This is an attempt to fix it. Maybe even to replace the python3 rewheel patch
in the future. Consider it proof of concept. Feedback is welcomed.
In the package that has wheel, one would do:
Requires: wheel(setuptools-39.1.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl)
...
pushd %{buildroot}%{python3_sitelib}/virtualenv_support
rm setuptools-39.1.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl
ln -s
%{_datatdir}/python-bundled-wheels/setuptools-39.1.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl .
...
popd
If desired, we could provide a macro for %{_datatdir}/python-bundled-wheels and
possible for the linking, so the maintainer would only need to: require the
wheel and run:
for WHL in %{buildroot}%{python3_sitelib}/virtualenv_support/*; do
%link_bundled_wheel $WHL
done
(This is just an idea and it is not done yet.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
5 years, 10 months