[Bug 1501522] Review Request:
fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec
Library for Android
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #81 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #78)
> (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #77)
> > (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76)
> > > let's move on, please request the repo using ->
> > >
> > > $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522
> > Would you volunteer to maintain the fdk-aac-nonfree counterpart in RPM
> > Fusion ?
> I would even re-phrase to: You are designed volunter to maintain the
> fdk-aac-nonfree along the current fedora fdk-aac maintainer. Now do the work!
I wouldn't say it like that. We can't force anyone working on anything. Rather
the other way around - a current fdk-aac maintained in RF should handle it.
Put it simply it's RF who is the second class citizen here, not the other way
around. So it's a RF maintainer's duty to cope with the Fedora changes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6 years
[Bug 1546544] Re-Review Request: renaming package bear to
bear-factory
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546544
Till Hofmann <thofmann(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(mgansser(a)online.d
| |e)
--- Comment #3 from Till Hofmann <thofmann(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
Martin, are you still working on this? Once you've fixed the issues above, I
will continue reviewing the package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6 years
[Bug 1501522] Review Request:
fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec
Library for Android
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #78 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #77)
> (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76)
> > let's move on, please request the repo using ->
> >
> > $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522
> Would you volunteer to maintain the fdk-aac-nonfree counterpart in RPM
> Fusion ?
I would even re-phrase to: You are designed volunter to maintain the
fdk-aac-nonfree along the current fedora fdk-aac maintainer. Now do the work!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6 years
[Bug 1562840] New: Review Request:
golang-gopkg-warnings-0 - Error handling with non-fatal errors (warnings)
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562840
Bug ID: 1562840
Summary: Review Request: golang-gopkg-warnings-0 - Error
handling with non-fatal errors (warnings)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-gopkg-warnings-0/golang-go...
SRPM URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-gopkg-warnings-0/golang-go...
Description:
A recurring programming pattern pattern is to allow interrupting the flow on
any
received error. But what if there are errors that should be noted but still not
fatal, for which the flow should not be interrupted? Implementing such logic at
each if statement would make the code complex and the flow much harder to
follow.
Package warnings provides the Collector type and a clean and simple pattern for
achieving such logic. The Collector takes care of deciding when to break the
flow and when to continue, collecting any non-fatal errors (warnings) along the
way. The only requirement is that fatal and non-fatal errors can be
distinguished programmatically.
Fedora Account System Username: rathann
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6 years
[Bug 1387178] New: Review Request:
golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio - Wrapper around bufio to provide
buffered runes access with unlimited unreads
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387178
Bug ID: 1387178
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio
- Wrapper around bufio to provide buffered runes
access with unlimited unreads
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL:
https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-pelletier-go-buff...
SRPM URL:
https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-pelletier-go-buff...
Description: Wrapper around bufio to provide buffered runes access with
unlimited unreads
Fedora Account System Username: jchaloup
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16134873
$ rpmlint golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio-0-0.1.gitdf1e16f.fc20.src.rpm
golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio-devel-0-0.1.gitdf1e16f.fc20.noarch.rpm
golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio-unit-test-devel-0-0.1.gitdf1e16f.fc20.x86_64.rpm
golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US)
bufio -> buffoon
golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US)
unreads -> unread, unready, unread s
golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio.src: W: spelling-error %description -l
en_US bufio -> buffoon
golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio.src: W: spelling-error %description -l
en_US unreads -> unread, unready, unread s
golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error
Summary(en_US) bufio -> buffoon
golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error
Summary(en_US) unreads -> unread, unready, unread s
golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error
%description -l en_US bufio -> buffoon
golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error
%description -l en_US unreads -> unread, unready, unread s
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
6 years